On what basis can the decisions in Zockoll v Mercury and Timeload v BT be distinguished from the decision in Paragon Finance v Nash?
A) The courts considered that the provision of a mortgage was grounds to distinguish the Paragon
B) Paragon was concerned with a financial service of the type exempted by the UCTA
C) Paragon was concerned with a positive obligation under the contract, Zockoll and Mercury were not
D) Zockoll and Timeload were concerned with positive obligations under a contract, Paragon was not
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: Should commercial parties simply be left to
Q14: Why might it might be desirable for
Q15: Does the existence of the UCTA demonstrate
Q16: To what extent could it be argued
Q17: The Unfair Contract Terms Act contains which
Q19: The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 prevents
Q20: A party can introduce an inclusion clause
Q21: A 'course of dealing' between parties may
Q22: In Olley v Marlborough Court Hotel the
Q23: A court would consider that there was
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents