Which of the following are not relevant consideration when determining whether a contract term is or is not reasonable for the purposes of UCTA Schedule 2?
A) Whether a party would or could reasonably have known about the exclusion clause
B) Whether, in a contract for the sale of goods, the goods were being manufactured to order
C) Whether a party is self-employed or has less then 5 years experience in a particular field
D) Whether or not the party uses similar or equivalent terms in their own contract
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: The signing of a written contractual agreement
Q2: Which of the following cases show the
Q3: Which of the following contracts are specifically
Q4: Which of the following contracts are regulated
Q5: Schedule 2 of the UCTA sets out
Q7: When dealing on written standard which of
Q8: How has the common law traditionally approached
Q9: What approach is taken by the courts
Q10: Does the control of exclusion clauses in
Q11: Does the courts control of exclusion clauses
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents