Is it sufficiently and readily clear for a victim of misrepresentation how the law will calculate damages under the Misrepresentation Act 1967?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is The Misrepresentation Act 1967 is a piece of UK legislation that provides remedies for victims of misrepresentation. When a person enters into a contract based on a false statement of fact made by the other party, and this induces them into the contract, they are considered a victim of misrepresentation.

Under the Misrepresentation Act 1967, the calculation of damages is not always straightforward, as it depends on the nature of the misrepresentation and the remedy sought. The Act distinguishes between fraudulent, negligent, and innocent misrepresentation, each with different implications for the calculation of damages.

1. Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Section 2(1)):
If the misrepresentation is made fraudulently, the victim can rescind the contract and also claim damages for all losses directly caused by the misrepresentation. The damages are calculated on the basis of tort principles, which aim to put the claimant in the position they would have been in had the misrepresentation not occurred. This can include both direct and consequential losses.

2. Negligent Misrepresentation (Section 2(1)):
For negligent misrepresentation (where the person making the statement had no reasonable grounds for believing its truth), the victim can either rescind the contract or claim damages. The damages are calculated in a similar way to fraudulent misrepresentation, aiming to compensate for losses suffered as a result of entering into the contract.

3. Innocent Misrepresentation (Section 2(2)):
In cases of innocent misrepresentation (where the misrepresentor had reasonable grounds to believe the statement was true), the court has discretion to award damages in lieu of rescission. The damages are calculated under the principle of indemnity, which means the claimant is compensated for actual financial losses incurred as a direct result of the misrepresentation.

It is important to note that the Misrepresentation Act 1967 also allows for the possibility of claiming damages under common law, which may provide different outcomes depending on the circumstances.

While the general principles for calculating damages under the Misrepresentation Act 1967 are set out in the legislation, the actual calculation can be complex and will depend on the specific facts of each case. It may not always be readily clear to a victim of misrepresentation how the law will calculate their damages without legal advice. The assessment of damages often requires a detailed analysis of the circumstances, the nature of the misrepresentation, and the losses suffered by the claimant. Therefore, it is advisable for victims of misrepresentation to seek legal counsel to understand their rights and the potential remedies available to them under the law.

Is It Sufficiently and Readily Clear for a Victim of Misrepresentation