In what sense is ethical absolutism sometimes thought to be irrational?
A) Adherence to absolute rules can frustrate the underlying purpose of the rules.
B) There is no evidence for the existence of objective moral rules.
C) Ethical absolutism requires assuming that one's views are right and that everyone else is wrong.
D) All of the above

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Ethical absolutism is sometimes considered irrational because strict adherence to absolute rules can sometimes lead to outcomes that frustrate the underlying purpose of the rules. For example, if an absolute rule is that lying is always wrong, this could lead to a situation where telling the truth would harm someone and lying would actually be the more ethical choice. This inflexibility can lead to a lack of nuance in ethical decision making. However, this does not necessarily mean that ethical absolutism is always irrational, as there may be cases where absolute rules are the most appropriate moral guidelines.

In What Sense Is Ethical Absolutism Sometimes Thought to Be