Stump claims that Swinburne makes a false assumption that men can only have knowledge of the consequences of their actions by induction based on experience, because God could provide us with this knowledge. Which of these competing views is more convincing? Defend your answer.
Correct Answer:
Answered by Quizplus AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q58: A theodicy is an explanation of the
Q59: An example of natural evil is an
Q60: According to the free-will defense, moral evil
Q61: The free-will defense claims
A) animals have free
Q62: Explain Swinburne's central argument providing his solution
Q64: Why does Stump think that the value
Q65: Stump argues that Swinburne's response to the
Q66: Stump argues that Swinburne's argument fails because
Q67: Stump claims that God could give us
Q68: According to Stump, the knowledge we gain
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents