Marxists and other radicals have criticized the field of the sociology of deviance for concentrating overly much on the examination of "nuts, sluts, and deviated preverts"-that is, the seamy, sensationalistic forms of deviance committed by marginal, powerless street people. Instead, they argue, very different forms of behavior should be regarded and studied as deviance. What are these other forms of behavior and why, from a Marxist or radical perspective, should they be regarded as deviant? Why has the field of deviance ignored the Marxist or radical "nuts and sluts" criticisms?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of Marxists and other radicals have criticized the field of the sociology of deviance for concentrating overly much on the examination of "nuts, sluts, and deviated preverts"-that is, the seamy, sensationalistic forms of deviance committed by marginal, powerless street people. Instead, they argue, very different forms of behavior should be regarded and studied as deviance. What are these other forms of behavior and why, from a Marxist or radical perspective, should they be regarded as deviant? Why has the field of deviance ignored the Marxist or radical "nuts and sluts" criticisms?

Marxists and Other Radicals Have Criticized the Field of the Sociology