Proponents of reflective equilibrium in ethical thinking argue that a theory or set of moral beliefs is justified if it maximizes the coherence of the overall set of beliefs that are accepted upon reflective examination.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: Casuistry is similar to case law in
Q24: Proponents of casuistry point out that ethicists
Q25: According to Beauchamp and Childress, casuists do
Q26: Beauchamp and Childress reject the use of
Q27: As discussed by Beauchamp and Childress, when
Q29: The form of reflective equilibrium Beauchamp and
Q30: One unresolved problem with the method of
Q31: Beauchamp and Childress claim that the four
Q32: Common-morality theories and customary moralities are two
Q33: Norms in particular moralities can differ because
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents