At what point can a moral judge claim to have reached a considered judgment, according to Beauchamp and Childress?
A) The judgment has been framed from an impartial perspective that reins in conflicts of interest and other temptations of self-interest.
B) The evaluator exhibits attitudes of sympathy and compassion for the welfare of others.
C) The evaluator possesses pertinent information about the relevant matters.
D) All of the above

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Beauchamp and Childress argue that a considered judgment in moral or ethical evaluation requires impartiality, empathy (such as sympathy and compassion), and informed understanding. Thus, all the options provided are essential components of reaching a considered judgment according to their framework.

At What Point Can a Moral Judge Claim to Have