What is one way Beauchamp and Childress describe the method of casuistry in ethical reasoning?
A) Casuistic thinkers exclude rules and principles from moral thinking.
B) Casuistic thinkers seek a unified theory with universal principles as a foundation for making moral judgments.
C) Casuistic thinkers believe that appropriate moral judgments occur through an intimate acquaintance with particular situations and the historical record of similar cases.
D) Casuistic thinkers focus only on the case at hand when making moral judgments.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Casuistic thinkers emphasize the importance of context and precedent in ethical decision-making, suggesting that understanding specific situations and how similar cases have been handled historically can guide appropriate moral judgments. This approach contrasts with theories that prioritize universal principles or rules.

What Is One Way Beauchamp and Childress Describe the Method