How, according to Abbate, does a soldier's obligation to obey lawful orders show that soldiers ought not to assume extra risks to protect civilian casualties?
A) Soldiers have a role-based obligation to abide by lawful orders, even if those orders prohibit the soldier from assuming extra risks to avoid collateral casualties. Therefore, if soldiers are ordered not to assume those risks, they are forbidden to do so.
B) Any order that does not require soldiers to assume extra risks to protect civilians is unlawful. Therefore, soldiers are not obligated to assume those risks.
C) The US Field Manual prohibits soldiers from assuming extra risks to protect civilians. Therefore, soldiers are obligated not to assume extra risks to protect civilians.
D) According to the principles of jus in bello, soldiers operate under a standing order to protect civilians. Therefore, they are obligated to assume any necessary risks to avoid collateral casualties.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1091: Which of the following best expresses the
Q1092: What is Abbate's basic conclusion in "Assuming
Q1093: What is the "principle of risk," according
Q1094: According to Abbate, which of the following
Q1095: Why does Abbate discuss the example of
Q1097: How, according to Abbate, does a soldier's
Q1098: Why, according to Abbate, is a soldier
Q1099: Why, according to Abbate, don't military commanders
Q1100: Which of the following best expresses Abbate's
Q1101: Which of the following would count as
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents