Woollard's main conclusion in this paper is:
A) Proximity is not a morally relevant factor when it comes to determining when we have the duty to make substantial sacrifices to help others in desperate need.
B) Proximity is a morally relevant factor when it comes to determining when we have the duty to make substantial sacrifices to help others in desperate need.
C) People from affluent countries still should do a lot more to prevent poverty-related deaths because the imperialist actions of their countries may be responsible for those deaths.
D) Morality should not demand too much from people; otherwise, it is implausible to expect people to adhere to moral standards and morality becomes useless as a guide for how to act.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q997: What, according to Shue, is the salient
Q998: Explain in your own words Shue's concept
Q999: In your own words, state, according to
Q1000: Given his arguments in "Should the Ticking
Q1001: Which of the following best captures the
Q1003: Which of the following best captures Woollard's
Q1004: Why does Woollard discuss the argument that
Q1005: According to Woollard, what strategies does Unger
Q1006: According to Woollard, how does Unger argue
Q1007: Why does Woollard think that the CB
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents