Rachels argues that an important distinction between active and passive euthanasia lies in the fact that in cases of passive euthanasia, the doctor can be truly said to have done nothing to assist in the patient's death.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Rachels argues that there is no morally important distinction between active and passive euthanasia, emphasizing that in both cases, the doctor's actions or inactions are aimed at bringing about the patient's death, thus challenging the notion that passive euthanasia involves doing nothing to assist in the patient's death.

Rachels Argues That an Important Distinction Between Active and Passive