Assume that Nell is correct that third parties have a duty to enforce other's right not to be killed. Which of the following could you infer from that claim?
A) People may have duties to change their social and political institutions, including states and international organizations, to better enforce people's right not to be killed.
B) If person A kills person B in self-defense, then B's right not to be killed is violated although A's actions are morally permissible.
C) People have duties to enforce the laws within their own countries to prevent the deaths of their fellow citizens but do not have duties to prevent deaths in other countries.
D) The duty to enforce person A's right not to be killed will require that one kills others who are trying to kill
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q553: Why does Nell discuss lifeboat situations in
Q554: What of the following is the best
Q555: What is the difference between killing someone
Q556: What role does the distinction between killing
Q557: Which of the following can we infer
Q559: Which of the following would count as
Q560: Which of the following would count as
Q561: Nell argues that the right not to
Q562: According to Nell, the duty to prevent
Q563: Nell argues that all killings are unjustifiable,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents