According to Nathanson, proportional retributivism is more plausible than equality retributivism because:
A) It provides recommendations regarding the appropriate punishment for specific crimes.
B) It does not imply that a range of punishments may be appropriate for a particular crime.
C) It does not entail that those guilty of barbaric crimes should be treated barbarically.
D) It provides an adequate account of criminals' moral desert of particular punishments.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

DProportional retributivism is considered more plausible than equality retributivism because it avoids the implication that barbaric crimes should be met with barbaric punishments (C), aligning with a more humane and ethical approach to justice. Additionally, it offers a framework for understanding the moral desert of particular punishments for criminals (D), suggesting that punishments should be proportionate to the severity of the crime and the moral culpability of the offender, rather than an equal or identical response to the crime committed.

According to Nathanson, Proportional Retributivism Is More Plausible Than Equality