Metz argues that because studies on the deterrent value of capital punishment are inconclusive, the death penalty cannot be rejected on consequentialist grounds.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Metz's argument is based on the inconclusiveness of studies regarding the deterrent effect of capital punishment. Since these studies do not definitively show that the death penalty fails to deter crime, Metz suggests that it cannot be rejected solely on consequentialist grounds, which focus on the outcomes or consequences of actions.

Metz Argues That Because Studies on the Deterrent Value of Capital