The Consequence Argument is supposed to establish
A) incompatibilism.
B) free will.
C) libertarianism.
D) soft determinism.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Consequence Argument is a philosophical argument that aims to establish incompatibilism, the view that determinism and free will are incompatible. It suggests that if determinism is true, then our actions are the consequence of laws of nature and events in the remote past, over which we have no control, thereby negating free will.

The Consequence Argument Is Supposed to Establish