Which of the following is the correct analysis of Coltman v Bibby Tankers?
A) The word 'includes' in that particular Act meant that the list was exhaustive. This was determined by reference to the other sections where lists were given.
B) The word 'includes' in that particular Act meant that the list was non-exhaustive. This was determined by reference to the other sections where lists were given.
C) The case is authority for the proposition that the use of the word 'includes' in a statute will always mean that the list is open-ended.
D) The case is authority for the proposition that the use of the word 'includes' will always mean that the list is exhaustive, so anything not specifically included in the list cannot be read into it.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Coltman v Bibby Tankers, the court interpreted the word 'includes' as indicating that the list provided in the Act was non-exhaustive. This interpretation was supported by examining the context and other sections within the Act, which helped to clarify the intended scope of the list.

Which of the Following Is the Correct Analysis of Coltman