Glaucon, in playing devil's advocate to the standard understanding of the nature of justice, ends his argument by saying that it would be difficult to distinguish between just and unjust persons if neither had any fear of consequences. Do you agree with this argument? Why or why not?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of Glaucon, in playing devil's advocate to the standard understanding of the nature of justice, ends his argument by saying that it would be difficult to distinguish between just and unjust persons if neither had any fear of consequences. Do you agree with this argument? Why or why not?

Glaucon, in Playing Devil's Advocate to the Standard Understanding of the Nature