Fatima was writing her results section in an article on organizational coaching and reported the following multiple linear regression result: "A multiple linear regression was utilized using the three domains of organizational coaching (affective, behavioral, and cognitive) as the independent variables and job satisfaction as the dependent variable. The linear combination of the independent variables was significantly related to the degree to which a participant was satisfied with her or his job: F(3, 369) = 61.51, p < .0005. The sample multiple correlation coefficient, R, was .58, which indicates that approximately 34% of the variance of an individual's motivation at work could be accounted for by the linear combination of the independent variables. However, only cognitive coaching (t = 3.33, p < .005, β = .27) and affective coaching (t = 4.39, p < .0005, β = .29) accounted for any of the unique variance." Which of the following statements is false?
A) The linear combination accounted for 33% of the variance.
B) R2 = .3364
C) The multiple linear regression was statistically significant.
D) All three organizational coaching variables accounted for unique variance.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Tika has found that her sum of
Q3: If Darlene finds that R2 = .81,
Q4: While calculating her regression, Polly finds that
Q5: If you have multiple interval/ratio variables and
Q6: The regression test is part of which
Q7: Which of the following is NOT a
Q8: Rory is researching how much variance in
Q9: Which of the following is a mathematical
Q10: Which of the following indicates the difference
Q11: For the following questions, use the regression
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents