Luck points out that one argument seems to imply that, as long as a game allowed you to molest people of all different ages, it would be OK to play it. Which argument is this?
A) The "social acceptability" argument
B) The "competition not the kill" argument
C) The "significant likelihoods" argument
D) The "unfairly singling out a group for harm" argument
E) The "special status of children" argument
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: According to Luck, although social conventions might
Q7: Luck says that one problem with the
Q8: Which argument would be akin to asserting
Q9: When Luck discusses the possibility that you're
Q10: Luck argues that those who engage in
Q12: Why shouldn't we say that harming a
Q13: The Gamer's Dilemma is that:
A) We should
Q14: What is Phillip Zema's point in talking
Q15: Review Phillip Zema's three premises that support
Q16: Phillip Zema argues that the NCAA does
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents