LaTonya joins the Freewill Church,and as a member,she is not allowed to wear pants.Her employer,Salo's Seafood,requires all employees to wear coveralls provided by the company for safety reasons.Although LaTonya wore the uniform prior to joining the church,she now refuses to wear the coveralls.She explains to Sal,the owner of the restaurant,that wearing pants is against her beliefs.Sal makes an exception in her case and allows her to wear knee-length boots with a protective jacket,but LaTonya refuses to wear the boots.Sal fires her for insubordination.Which of the following holds true in this case?
A) Sal is liable for religious discrimination for failing to provide an accommodation that LaTonya would accept.
B) Sal is liable for religious discrimination for failing to provide a reasonable alternative.
C) Sal is not liable for religious discrimination because LaTonya's religious practice is not followed by any other employee at the company.
D) Sal is not liable for religious discrimination because he made an effort to reasonably accommodate LaTonya's religious practice.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: Employers need to be concerned with the
Q4: For an employer to be required to
Q5: Unions also have a duty to reasonably
Q6: If other employees are not willing to
Q7: Groups such as the Ku Klux Klan
Q9: Cara has been a customer service associate
Q10: The issue of religion was addressed by
Q11: An employee who has a religious conflict
Q12: Title VII includes a duty to reasonably
Q13: Atheism cannot be considered the equivalent of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents