In the case of Speelman v. Pascal , the court held that:
A) a gratuitous assignment is terminated by the assignor's death, even if the assignor made an effective delivery of the assignment prior to his death.
B) assignments of rights to sums that are expected to become due to the assignor are enforceable.
C) assignments cannot be made of sums that are not presently due but are expected to become due in the future.
D) personal contracts are not assignable.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court in Speelman v. Pascal held that assignments of rights to sums expected to become due are enforceable, even if the sums are not presently due.

In the Case of Speelman V