Which of the following would always be considered to be contrary to public policy?
A) A contract which contains a covenant not to compete.
B) A contract offered on a take-it-or-leave-it basis.
C) An agreement to pay someone to make false statements about a competitor's product.
D) An agreement which contains an exculpatory clause.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

An agreement to pay someone to make false statements about a competitor's product is always considered to be contrary to public policy because it involves committing an act of fraud or defamation, which is illegal and harmful to the public interest.

Which of the Following Would Always Be Considered to Be