Which of the following elements is not required to prove the liability of a driver for negligence in an automobile accident?
A)a legal duty to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances
B)circumstances in which a hazard is enhanced by foul weather, high speed, or other conditions
C)breach of the specified duty
D)injury proximately caused by the breach of duty

Question

Which of the following elements is not required to prove the liability of a driver for negligence in an automobile accident? ​ ​
A)a legal duty to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances
B)circumstances in which a hazard is enhanced by foul weather, high speed, or other conditions
C)breach of the specified duty
D)injury proximately caused by the breach of duty

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

To prove the liability of a driver for negligence in an automobile accident, it is necessary to establish a legal duty to exercise reasonable care (A), a breach of that duty (C), and an injury proximately caused by the breach (D). The enhancement of a hazard by external conditions like foul weather or high speed (B) is not a required element to establish negligence, although it may influence the assessment of the driver's behavior and the breach of duty.

Which of the Following Elements Is Not Required to Prove