Which course of action should you follow?
a) You have to decline as it is a definite conflict and is effectively ruled out by the ethical guidelines of your RSB.
b) It is a conflict of interest and there is a danger of being involved in management decision making which is prohibited specifically by the ethical rules. Providing separate teams were used and the internal audit was overseen by another partner it would be possible to take on the work. The external audit team must remain independent of the internal audit team and there must be no communication between them except at arm's length during the course of the audit.
c) It will help the audit by giving you a better insight into the company so could be looked at as an extension of the external audit. You could use the same team and simply amend the external audit programs accordingly.
d) If this was the USA it would be illegal and cases such as Enron demonstrate the dangers of being seen to go soft on the company because of all the lucrative non audit work - best to avoid the whole thing even if it means a rival firm becomes involved with your client.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q2: Which one of the following best describes
Q3: List five threats to auditor independence and
Q4: State whether the following statements are true
Q5: Which of these is not the function
Q6: Explain the responsibilities of
-the directors
-the auditors
in connection
Q8: Briefly describe three audit strategies
Q9: Mautz and Sharaf set out a series
Q10: List the five fundamental ethical principles all
Q11: Set out the rights and duties of
Q12: What are the preconditions for an audit?
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents