What is the creationist argument against macroevolution?
A) Living organisms are so complex that random processes, such as natural selection, could never have created them.
B) There is no way to scientifically observe biological changes in populations over time.
C) Scientists push evolutionary theory for political, not scholarly, purposes.
D) Creation scientists have discredited the concept of macroevolution through rigorous scientific testing.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Creationists argue that the complexity and intricacy of living organisms are too great to have arisen through random processes and natural selection alone. They argue that there must be a guiding force behind the development of life on earth.

Answer: B
 Creationists argue that because macroevolution cannot be directly observed, it is not a valid scientific theory. They claim that scientists rely on circumstantial evidence in support of macroevolution, which is not enough to prove a scientific theory.

Answer: C
 Some creationists argue that scientists promote evolutionary theory for political reasons, rather than based on the evidence. They claim that scientists who support evolution have a bias against religion and are attempting to undermine the beliefs of religious people.

Answer: D
 There is no scientific evidence to support the claim that creation scientists have "discredited" the concept of macroevolution. Most mainstream scientists consider evolution to be a well-established scientific theory based on the evidence. However, some creationists may argue that their religious beliefs contradict the idea of macroevolution, and therefore reject it.

What Is the Creationist Argument Against Macroevolution