Suppose the jury determines that the evidence presented by the prosecutors does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.What is the difference between concluding that the defendant is innocent, and concluding that the defendant is not guilty (if any)?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of Suppose the jury determines that the evidence presented by the prosecutors does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.What is the difference between concluding that the defendant is innocent, and concluding that the defendant is not guilty (if any)?

Suppose the Jury Determines That the Evidence Presented by the Prosecutors