A location analysis has been narrowed down to two locations, Akron and Boston. The main factors in the decision will be the supply of raw materials, which has a weight of 0.50, transportation cost, which has a weight of 0.40, and labor cost, which has a weight of 0.10. The scores for raw materials, transportation, and labor are for Akron 60, 80, and 70, respectively; for Boston 70, 50, and 90, respectively. Given this information and a minimum acceptable composite score of 75, we can say that the manager should
A) be indifferent between these locations.
B) choose Akron.
C) choose Boston.
D) reject both locations.
E) build a plant in both cities.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: Which statement best characterizes the objective of
Q22: Location options do not usually include
A)expansion.
B)a contract.
C)adding
Q23: When a location evaluation includes both quantitative
Q24: Retail businesses often engage in _, the
Q25: The method for evaluating location alternatives that
Q27: Cultural differences, customer preferences, labor, and resources
Q28: Locational cost-profit-volume analysis assumes
(I)nonlinear variable costs.(II)fixed costs
Q29: The Skulls, a student social organization, has
Q30: Which of the following is the last
Q31: The method for evaluating location alternatives that
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents