What would be the MOST LIKELY reason for derelict land not to undergo reclamation?
A)There is no topsoil left to reclaim.
B)The soil is too toxic to support native vegetation.
C)The ore removed was not coal, so federal regulations do not require reclamation.
D)Environmentalists ignored the problem.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Federal regulations often require reclamation for coal mining, but not necessarily for other types of ore, making it less likely for non-coal sites to undergo reclamation.

What Would Be the MOST LIKELY Reason for Derelict Land