Why do superseding causes allow defendants to avoid liability?
A) Superseding causes do not allow defendants to avoid liability.
B) Superseding causes are an example of the res ipsa loquitur defense.
C) Superseding causes are evidence that a defendant's breach of duty was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.
D) Superseding causes demonstrate the plaintiff was actually responsible for his own injuries.
E) Superseding causes are evidence that a defendant's duty of care was fulfilled and thus no negligence occurred.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Superseding causes break the direct link between the defendant's actions and the plaintiff's injuries, indicating that the defendant's breach of duty was not the proximate (direct) cause of the harm suffered. This can absolve the defendant of liability because it shows that an unforeseeable, intervening event was the actual cause of the injuries.

Why Do Superseding Causes Allow Defendants to Avoid Liability