Section 29 of the contract which states, "Pigment may be redesigned at any time."
-Serena claims the contract is not valid because she only typed her name onto an electronic form and she did not "sign" any contract. Is she correct?
A) No, because e-contracts are legally valid.
B) Yes, to be valid, she needed to print the form, sign in, and send it in.
C) Yes, although an e-contract is valid, it is voidable.
D) Yes, since she paid the down payment, the contract was executory and e-contracts that are executory are void.
E) No, an e-contract is voidable where there is no consideration.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

E-contracts are legally valid, and typing one's name into an electronic form is considered a form of electronic signature, which is recognized as valid under laws such as the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-SIGN Act) in the United States and similar legislation in other jurisdictions.

Section 29 of the Contract Which States, "Pigment May Be