In the Case Opener, Hallmark claimed that an arbitration ruling against a former employee should be upheld. Which of the following was the result of the case?
A) The former employee was barred from proceeding in court because of the binding arbitration clause.
B) The former employee was barred from proceeding in court based on the statute of limitations which expired while she was pursuing her remedies in arbitration.
C) The former employee was allowed to proceed in court because she had exhausted her remedies in the arbitration arena.
D) The former employee could proceed with an action in court because there was no consideration for the arbitration agreement and, therefore, no valid agreement.
E) The former employee could proceed with an action in court because, as a matter of law, arbitration agreements are barred in the arbitration context.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In the Case Opener, Hallmark claimed that an arbitration ruling against a former employee should be upheld. Which of the following was the result of the case?
A) The former employee was barred from proceeding in court because of the binding arbitration clause.
B) The former employee was barred from proceeding in court based on the statute of limitations which expired while she was pursuing her remedies in arbitration.
C) The former employee was allowed to proceed in court because she had exhausted her remedies in the arbitration arena.
D) The former employee could proceed with an action in court because there was no consideration for the arbitration agreement and, therefore, no valid agreement.
E) The former employee could proceed with an action in court because, as a matter of law, arbitration agreements are barred in the arbitration context.

In the Case Opener, Hallmark Claimed That an Arbitration Ruling