In Lopez v. Kmart Corporation, the case in the text regarding disaffirmance, did the court find the minor plaintiff's disaffirmance of an employment contract to be reasonable?
A) Yes, because the disaffirmance occurred within one month of reaching the age of majority.
B) Yes, because the disaffirmance occurred within six months of reaching the age of majority.
C) The court did not find the disaffirmance to be reasonable.
D) No, because the plaintiff could have disaffirmed the contract when he was under the age of majority but chose not to do so.
E) Yes, because the type of contract at issue was an arbitration agreement.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q73: Depending on the size of the print
Q74: [Zaltar Zeb] Zeb suffers from delusions that
Q75: The type of agreement Ines asked the
Q76: [Zaltar Zeb] Zeb suffers from delusions that
Q77: [Motorcycle crash] Cassandra, who would be turning
Q79: [Poker dealer] Roland and Parna sign a
Q80: [Motorcycle crash] Cassandra, who would be turning
Q81: [Pedicurist license] Briana applied for a job
Q82: Explain Great Britain's approach to the age
Q83: What is usury? What are the two
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents