In the case that opened the chapter, Abbott Industries supplied 1.2 million tubes of bad eye medication to Altana, a customer, for resale. What did the court rule regarding the liability of Abbott Industries?
A) That Abbott industries was liable for the cost of the recall and destruction of the defective medication, for the costs of employee overtime, and for lost future sales because Altana was unable to meet its contractual obligations.
B) That Abbott industries was liable for the cost of the recall and destruction of the defective medication, for the costs of employee overtime, and for lost future sales even though Altana was able to meet its contractual obligations.
C) That Abbott industries was liable for the cost of the recall and destruction of the defective medication and for the costs of employee overtime, but not for lost future sales because Altana was able to meet its contractual obligations.
D) That Altana was only entitled to receive cover, meaning substitution for the defective medication.
E) That Altana was unable to recover anything because business people take a risk that some shipments will be bad.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q65: A non-breaching seller, Jasmin is seeking a
Q66: What was the result on appeal in
Q67: Which of the following is true regarding
Q68: When will a court refuse to uphold
Q69: [Refused Furniture] Maya arranged to sell furniture
Q71: [Refused Furniture] Maya arranged to sell furniture
Q72: Greg is seeking a remedy as a
Q73: [Missed Payments] Blake, who loved water sports
Q74: When buyers or lessees want to accept
Q75: What does the UCC say regarding a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents