Which of the following was the result in the Case Opener, involving the check taken in good faith by a market, later returned to the market based on a stop payment order, and purchased from the market by the plaintiff who sued Cigna, the issuer of the check?
A) The plaintiff was allowed to recover under the shelter principle and holder-in-due-course status.
B) The plaintiff was not allowed to recover because he took the check knowing of a problem.
C) The plaintiff was allowed to recover because the market misrepresented the status of the check.
D) The plaintiff was not allowed to recover because of the shelter principle and holder-in-due-course status.
E) The plaintiff was not allowed to recover because the market misrepresented the status of the check.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q52: Which of the following does not prevent
Q53: The Japanese Commercial Code does not recognize
Q54: A(n) _ is a party in possession
Q55: Which of the following does the UCC
Q56: Which statement is true regarding the requirement
Q58: If an issuer forgets to write the
Q59: A party who receives a negotiable instrument
Q60: How may the holder endorse the document
Q61: A(n) _ instrument becomes overdue at any
Q62: [House Painting] Graciela Reyes signed a check
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents