What type of scientific/expert testimony requires a higher standard of review before it can be used in court?
A)any academic studies
B)any studies developed for use at trial
C)any studies in an area in which experts differ
D)none of the above

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Studies developed for use at trial, also known as "litigation-driven science," require a higher standard of review before it can be used in court. This is because these studies are often conducted specifically for the purpose of being used as evidence in a particular case, and may not adhere to the same scientific standards as studies conducted for purely academic or scientific purposes. The other options (A and C) may also require review and scrutiny, but not necessarily to the same degree as studies developed for use at trial. Option D is incorrect, as some types of scientific/expert testimony do require a higher standard of review.

What Type of Scientific/expert Testimony Requires a Higher Standard of Review