Consistent with the research by Romer, Gruder, and Lizardo (1986), which statement is the BEST inductive conclusion that can be drawn from the discussion of whether people are basically selfish?
A) People are almost always altruistic except under unusual circumstances.
B) People show individual differences in helping, with some helping only if they get something in return.
C) People cannot be classified as selfish or unselfish, and the willingness to help depends only on whether they are promised some kind of reward.
D) Selfish people may get an intrinsic reward for helping, but would not help if provided with an external reward.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The research by Romer, Gruder, and Lizardo (1986) suggests that people show individual differences in helping, with some helping only if they get something in return. This conclusion is the most supported by the discussion of whether people are basically selfish, which includes examples of people helping others for a variety of reasons, including the expectation of a reward. Option A is not supported by the discussion, as it suggests that people are almost always altruistic, which is contradicted by the examples given. Option C is also not supported by the discussion, as it suggests that the willingness to help depends only on whether a reward is promised, whereas the examples suggest that other factors, such as empathy or social norms, can also play a role. Option D may be true for some people, but it is not a general conclusion that can be drawn from the discussion, which includes examples of people who do not help even if there is no external reward.

Consistent with the Research by Romer, Gruder, and Lizardo (1986)