The chapter discussion on whether people are basically selfish or unselfish is divided into different sections. The sections contain evidence on each side of the question. To draw a well-reasoned conclusion from the entire passage, the critical thinker must evaluate
A) the quality and quantity of evidence supporting each side in each section and then generalize from this analysis.
B) the arguments versus non-arguments in the overall discussion and then deduce the strongest conclusion.
C) how good are the arguments and counterarguments made in the discussion.
D) the perspectives that provide different information to decide which perspective leads to the most reasonable conclusion.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A evaluates the quality and quantity of evidence supporting each side in each section and then draws a conclusion from this analysis, which is the most thorough and logical approach to reach a well-reasoned conclusion. B is too simplistic and does not consider the quality of arguments. C is too narrow in focus and ignores the sections' overall contribution to the question. D is useful for considering different perspectives, but it does not provide a systematic approach to analyzing evidence throughout the entire passage.

The Chapter Discussion on Whether People Are Basically Selfish or Unselfish