Many object to the balancing approach for regulating chemicals because
A) scientific results are often too weak to show benefits and costs clearly.
B) matters of life and death are moral issues, and should be treated as such.
C) politicians, not economists, should determine the values that society places on outcomes.
D) all of the above.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

All of the given reasons are commonly cited objections to the balancing approach for regulating chemicals. Some argue that the scientific evidence supporting the balancing approach is inadequate, while others believe that decisions about human health and safety should not be reduced to calculations of costs and benefits. Still, others argue that economic values should not be the ultimate basis for regulatory decision-making.

Many Object to the Balancing Approach for Regulating Chemicals Because