CASE 10.3James v.Meow Media,Inc.(2002) addressed whether a video game manufacturer was strictly liable for a teenager's shooting spree.What was the court's holding?
A) That the shooting was so aberrant as to be unforeseeable by the video game producer.
B) That the products were defective.
C) That the video game manufacturer was liable for the shooting.
D) That the shooting was so aberrant as to be unforeseeable by the video game producer but also that the products at issue were defective.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q47: The FDA requires that manufacturers provide full
Q53: CASE 10.2 Branham v.Ford Motor Co.(2010)was reversed
Q55: ThePLIVA,Inc.v.Mensing case discussed in the text,involved theissue
Q57: Which of the following members of the
Q60: Under what circumstances will a successor corporation
Q61: What are the four basic parts of
Q62: Set forth the elements of a strict
Q63: Fred sued Document Security Company,alleging he had
Q64: Paula recently went to see her doctor
Q65: Set forth what a manufacturer of products
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents