A comparison of the standard of proof needed to win civil cases and criminal cases suggests that:
A) the standard of proof is the same for both types of casesthe case must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
B) the burden of proof is lower in civil cases than it is in criminal cases.
C) the burden of proof is more stringent in civil cases than it is in criminal cases.
D) the burden of proof varies in civil cases depending on the type of case and the circumstances, so that it may be either much more stringent or much less stringent than the burden in criminal cases.

Question

A comparison of the standard of proof needed to win civil cases and criminal cases suggests that:
A) the standard of proof is the same for both types of cases­the case must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
B) the burden of proof is lower in civil cases than it is in criminal cases.
C) the burden of proof is more stringent in civil cases than it is in criminal cases.
D) the burden of proof varies in civil cases depending on the type of case and the circumstances, so that it may be either much more stringent or much less stringent than the burden in criminal cases.

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The burden of proof is lower in civil cases than it is in criminal cases. In civil cases, the plaintiff only needs to prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence (meaning it is more likely than not that their claim is true), whereas in criminal cases, the prosecutor must prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.

A Comparison of the Standard of Proof Needed to Win