The arbitrary and conventional sample size determination methods have a basic difference.Of the following,which item best describes that basic difference?
A)The conventional approach has no defensible logic;arbitrary approach appears to have faulty logic.
B)The arbitrary approach has no defensible logic;conventional approach appears logical but is faulty.
C)The conventional approach doesn't appear to be logical;arbitrary approach has defensible logic.
D)The arbitrary approach has no defensible logic;conventional approach is logical,but is faulty.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The arbitrary approach has no defensible logic, meaning that it is not based on any sound reasoning or method. On the other hand, the conventional approach appears logical but is faulty, meaning that it may follow a specific set of rules or guidelines but may not be the most optimal or accurate method for determining sample size. Therefore, the basic difference between these two approaches is that the arbitrary approach lacks any sound reasoning, while the conventional approach may have some logic but is not necessarily the best method.

The Arbitrary and Conventional Sample Size Determination Methods Have a Basic