According to Benford's Law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that
follow the distribution shown in the table below. Test for goodness-of-fit with Benford's Law. $$\begin{array} { | l | c | c | c | c | c | c | c | c | c | }
\hline \text { Leading Digit } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 \
\hline \begin{array} { l }
\text { Benford's law: } \
\text { distribution of } \
\text { leading digits }
\end{array} & 30.1 \% & 17.6 \% & 12.5 \% & 9.7 \% & 7.9 \% & 6.7 \% & 5.8 \% & 5.1 \% & 4.6 \% \
\hline
\end{array}$$ When working for the Brooklyn District Attorney, investigator Robert Burton analyzed the leading digits of the
amounts from 784 checks issued by seven suspect companies. The frequencies were found to be 0, 18, 0, 79, 476, 180, 8,
23, and 0, and those digits correspond to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively. If the observed
frequencies are substantially different from the frequencies expected with Benford's Law, the check amounts
appear to result from fraud. Use a 0.05 significance level to test for goodness-of-fit with Benford's Law. Does it
appear that the checks are the result of fraud?

Question

According to Benford's Law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that
follow the distribution shown in the table below. Test for goodness-of-fit with Benford's Law. $$\begin{array} { | l | c | c | c | c | c | c | c | c | c | } 
\hline \text { Leading Digit } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 \
\hline \begin{array} { l } 
\text { Benford's law: } \
\text { distribution of } \
\text { leading digits }
\end{array} & 30.1 \% & 17.6 \% & 12.5 \% & 9.7 \% & 7.9 \% & 6.7 \% & 5.8 \% & 5.1 \% & 4.6 \% \
\hline
\end{array}$$ When working for the Brooklyn District Attorney, investigator Robert Burton analyzed the leading digits of the
amounts from 784 checks issued by seven suspect companies. The frequencies were found to be 0, 18, 0, 79, 476, 180, 8,
23, and 0, and those digits correspond to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively. If the observed
frequencies are substantially different from the frequencies expected with Benford's Law, the check amounts
appear to result from fraud. Use a 0.05 significance level to test for goodness-of-fit with Benford's Law. Does it
appear that the checks are the result of fraud?

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of According to Benford's Law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that
follow the distribution shown in the table below. Test for goodness-of-fit with Benford's Law. $$\begin{array} { | l | c | c | c | c | c | c | c | c | c | } 
\hline \text { Leading Digit } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 \
\hline \begin{array} { l } 
\text { Benford's law: } \
\text { distribution of } \
\text { leading digits }
\end{array} & 30.1 \% & 17.6 \% & 12.5 \% & 9.7 \% & 7.9 \% & 6.7 \% & 5.8 \% & 5.1 \% & 4.6 \% \
\hline
\end{array}$$ When working for the Brooklyn District Attorney, investigator Robert Burton analyzed the leading digits of the
amounts from 784 checks issued by seven suspect companies. The frequencies were found to be 0, 18, 0, 79, 476, 180, 8,
23, and 0, and those digits correspond to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively. If the observed
frequencies are substantially different from the frequencies expected with Benford's Law, the check amounts
appear to result from fraud. Use a 0.05 significance level to test for goodness-of-fit with Benford's Law. Does it
appear that the checks are the result of fraud?

According to Benford's Law, a Variety of Different Data Sets