Determine if the argument is valid or a fallacy. Give a reason to justify answer.
-If the bough breaks, then the cradle will fall.
$\underline { \text {The bough breaks.} }$
The cradle will fall.
A) Valid by reasoning of transitivity
B) Fallacy by fallacy of the inverse
C) Fallacy by fallacy of the converse
D) Valid by modus ponens

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This argument follows the structure of modus ponens, which is a form of argument where if a conditional statement ("if p, then q") is accepted, and the antecedent (p) is affirmed, then the consequent (q) must also be affirmed. Here, "if the bough breaks, then the cradle will fall" is the conditional statement, and "The bough breaks" affirms the antecedent, leading to the conclusion that "The cradle will fall."

Determine If the Argument Is Valid or a Fallacy The bough breaks.‾\underline { \text {The bough breaks.} }The bough breaks.​

Determine If the Argument Is Valid or a Fallacy $\underline { \text {The bough breaks.} }$