Some have suggested that the efforts to get Britain out of India were successful because (unlike Hitler's Third Reich, for example) Britain was a country that could be moved by moral persuasion, and thus nonviolent efforts may be successful with other conflicts. What do you think? Do nonviolent strategies have to depend on moral persuasion, or do they have recourse to other means. Was there something particularly moral about the English?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q46: Berry argues that the "developed nations" have
Q47: Fry argues that war is a phenomena
Q48: Fry express hopes that war can be
Q49: What evidence does Fry present for the
Q50: Fry argues that war serves an evolutionary
Q52: Which of the following best captures the
Q53: Make a list of similarities and differences
Q54: Pilisuk argues that to genuinely understand violence,
Q55: Which of the following is a key
Q56: Berry argues for a decentralized world economy
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents