Holmes writes that the assumptions that nonviolence wouldn't have worked against Hitler and that violence was successful in World War II require some qualification. Explain his qualifications to these views in your own words. Do you agree that these assumptions about nonviolence are limited and only assumptions? Or has history given them support? Explain your answer with specific examples.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q17: Do we have greater responsibilities than to
Q18: Minch argues that to wear the uniform
Q19: According to Johnson, just war theory sanctions
Q20: Johnson thinks that violence can be used
Q21: Holmes argues that the only intrinsic value
Q23: Holmes argues that the fundamental problem we
Q24: Holmes argues that the commitment to nonviolence
Q25: Gandhi argues that there can be no
Q26: How does Holmes propose to displace the
Q27: Do you think the concept of jihad
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents