In the first paragraph of the section "The Super-Meaning," Frankl contrasts two possible burdens of human existence and argues that only one is a genuine burden. Which is it? Do you think that there is any real difference between saying "life is meaningless" and saying "life is meaningful in a way I can't possibly understand" if either way we can't grasp the meaningfulness of life? If so, what is the difference? If not, how would Frankl's philosophy be impacted?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In the first paragraph of the section "The Super-Meaning," Frankl contrasts two possible burdens of human existence and argues that only one is a genuine burden. Which is it? Do you think that there is any real difference between saying "life is meaningless" and saying "life is meaningful in a way I can't possibly understand" if either way we can't grasp the meaningfulness of life? If so, what is the difference? If not, how would Frankl's philosophy be impacted?

In the First Paragraph of the Section "The Super-Meaning," Frankl