Does the statement "The sale of goods will not be enforceable unless there is some writing,signed by the defendant,indicating that the parties reached an agreement" accurately reflect the UCC's basic rule?
A)No.It should also state that the contract must be signed by both parties, not just the defendant.
B)No. It should state that the contract must require all of the terms of the agreement to be in writing.
C)No. It should state that the contract must be for the sale of goods of $500 or more.
D)Yes, the wording accurately reflects the UCC's basic rule.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The statement is partially correct, as it reflects the UCC's Statute of Frauds requirement for sale of goods contracts that are worth $500 or more. However, it is important to note that the writing requirement applies to both parties, not just the defendant. Additionally, the writing must at least indicate that a contract for the sale of goods has been made and must contain essential terms such as price, quantity, and delivery. Therefore, option C is the best choice as it reflects the requirement for contracts worth $500 or more.

Does the Statement "The Sale of Goods Will Not Be