Consider the following argument:
1. If, on balance, speech codes do more harm than good, they should be eliminated.
2. Speech codes do harm by impeding the search for knowledge, undermining democracy, banning the expression of unpopular ideas and views, and hampering free and open dialogue.
3. Speech codes may do good by preventing some harm to vulnerable groups, but the good does not outweigh the harm the codes cause.
4. Therefore, speech codes should be eliminated. Which of the statements above would be accepted by both supporters and opponents of speech codes?
A) Statement 1
B) Statement 2
C) Statement 3
D) Statement 4
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Hate speech is not merely unpleasant or
Q2: The central conflict in campus free speech
Q4: Some consequentialists have argued that speech critical
Q5: Which philosopher said that "free and unfettered
Q6: Some consequentialists recognize the harms of hate
Q7: Free speech scholars Erwin Chemerinsky and Howard
Q8: The right to express your opinions or
Q9: A 2015 survey of college students showed
Q10: The terms "free speech" and "free expression"
Q11: The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents