Mr. Holden, a program developer, developed software for inventory control that was superior to others on the market. He launched an ad campaign and all went well for several months-until a competitor came out with a cheaper program. In time, he could not pay his debts when they became due and owing. A supplier sued for damages and was awarded judgment for $21,000. Holden did not pay. With regard to the supplier's position at this time, which of the following is false?
A) Since the decision is in his favour, the supplier would be a judgment creditor, Holden, a judgment debtor.
B) The supplier could have a garnishee order served on Holden's bank, ordering the bank to pay money into court instead of to Holden.
C) The supplier could examine Holden under oath about his assets and sources of income.
D) The supplier could obtain a writ of execution that directs a court official to seize Holden and detain him in court until he arranges payment.
E) The supplier could get a government-authorized official to seize and sell enough of Holden's property to satisfy the debt.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q41: Which of the following is true with
Q42: Hank sold three properties for Mr. W
Q43: With regard to the process of a
Q44: Which of the following is false with
Q45: (Modify this question for your province.) Which
Q47: A privative clause is which of the
Q48: Which one of the following statements is
Q49: A requirement of the rules of _
Q50: In the procedure leading to trial of
Q51: When a government administrator refuses to make
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents